Skip to content

fix(detector): detect getitem store replay#154

Closed
prasannakotyal wants to merge 1 commit into
gpu-mode:mainfrom
prasannakotyal:kg-blue-196-getitem-store-replay
Closed

fix(detector): detect getitem store replay#154
prasannakotyal wants to merge 1 commit into
gpu-mode:mainfrom
prasannakotyal:kg-blue-196-getitem-store-replay

Conversation

@prasannakotyal

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Targets KG red #196, where custom_kernel stores the first input-derived output inside an object, then replays it through that object's custom __getitem__ path.

This adds a narrow GETITEM_STORE_REPLAY detector. It requires:

  • a local class defining __getitem__
  • a module-level instance of that class
  • an entrypoint mutating one of that instance's attribute containers from input-derived data
  • an input-independent guard over the same instance
  • a call-free replay body returning a subscript of that instance

Method reader replay and bool-method replay stay out of scope.

KernelGuard-Red-Submission: 196

Local verification

  • red_82_getitem_store_replay -> GETITEM_STORE_REPLAY, should_filter=True
  • red_83_method_store_replay stayed valid
  • red_115_method_reader_replay stayed valid
  • red_81_bool_method_replay stayed valid
  • clean fixtures in eval_blue_patch.py stayed valid
  • uv run python -m py_compile kernelguard.py

@prasannakotyal prasannakotyal temporarily deployed to kernelguard-api-control-plane May 2, 2026 04:49 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented May 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

KernelGuard Blue Evaluation

@SinatrasC

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for the KernelGuard Flywheel Campaign contribution. We are not merging this narrow variant separately because the consolidated rule-family implementation in #273 is the merge path for this detector area.

@SinatrasC SinatrasC closed this Jun 20, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants