examples(android): Update dependencies#47
Merged
Conversation
Using staticlib here is unnecessary and the official bevy example also uses lib
SergioRibera
approved these changes
Mar 24, 2026
Owner
|
Thank you very much for your collaboration |
Contributor
Author
Of course. Thanks again for merging this! 🥇 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose
android-activity@0.6.1has officially been release and the patch is no longer neededChanges
android-activitypatchlibs.versions.tomlgradle-daemon-jvm.propertiesfrom./gradlew updateDaemonJvmAdditional Changes
It seems like
Cargo.lockwas removed from gitignore. I have fixed this in this pr because for a library it is intended to be ignored. I think this has been done in a merge of one of my recent PRs.Not ignoring
Cargo.lockresults in a lot of unrelated changes in PRs toCargo.lockand in a library the file is mostly useless anyways, therefore the comment:I can of course not include this change in this PR, but as far as I know, it is necessary to change
Cargo.lockhere and that change would be unnecessary aswell. Also it would add aCargo.lockto both mobile examples which is also useless.