Hi! Thanks for sharing knowledge-graph — clean approach for local graph-based PKM with Claude Code.
While evaluating it for a knowledge-base setup, I noticed the README states "## License: MIT", but the repository does not contain a LICENSE file:
gh repo view obra/knowledge-graph --json licenseInfo → nullgh api repos/obra/knowledge-graph/contents/LICENSE → 404- GitHub's UI shows no detected license
Would you mind adding a LICENSE file with the MIT text? That clarifies things for users who verify licensing programmatically (OSS compliance checks, license cheatsheets, automated audits) and unlocks the file-level confidence many evaluation pipelines require.
Happy to send a PR if that's easier — just let me know your preferred copyright line (e.g. Copyright (c) 2026 Jesse Vincent).
Thanks!
Hi! Thanks for sharing
knowledge-graph— clean approach for local graph-based PKM with Claude Code.While evaluating it for a knowledge-base setup, I noticed the README states "## License: MIT", but the repository does not contain a
LICENSEfile:gh repo view obra/knowledge-graph --json licenseInfo→nullgh api repos/obra/knowledge-graph/contents/LICENSE→ 404Would you mind adding a
LICENSEfile with the MIT text? That clarifies things for users who verify licensing programmatically (OSS compliance checks, license cheatsheets, automated audits) and unlocks the file-level confidence many evaluation pipelines require.Happy to send a PR if that's easier — just let me know your preferred copyright line (e.g.
Copyright (c) 2026 Jesse Vincent).Thanks!