Fix 4626 classification#4638
Open
fleupold wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
Contributor
|
Claude finished @fleupold's task in 2m 33s —— View job PR Review: Fix 4626 classification
Verdict: LGTM ✅Clean, well-scoped fix. The logic correctly distinguishes a contract-level rejection (partial/non-conforming EIP-4626 token) from a transient transport failure:
Minor (non-blocking, pre-existing)The negative cache is process-lifetime and never evicted. A legitimate vault that is temporarily reverting on |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Wintermute is looking to enable quotes for their Wildcat issued wmtUSDx tokens (e.g. wmtUSDC). Currently those tokens fail quoting because we cannot find a native price. The reason for this is that the token looks like an ERC-4626 vault token (ie. it implements
assets()) but doesn't follow the standard (ie it doesn't implementconvertToAssets()).In our current logic failure to convert gets bubbled up directly as an estimation error (without attempting the standard ERC20 estimator path)
Changes
How to test
Added unit test